Making a Difference: Nancy Jacobs Maryland State Senate  
  Visit Nancy Jacobs for Congress  
   
   
     
 
<< Back to Newsletters

Click here to subscribe...

Email Newsletter of March 25, 2006

Senator Nancy Jacobs: District 34: Cecil and Harford Counties
News Update from Senator Nancy Jacobs
District 34: Harford and Cecil Counties
March 25, 2006

In this Issue...
* SB 297- Contraception Dispensing Program
* Teacher Pension Update
* News You Can Use
* I Want to Hear from You

This was an eventful week as every week will be until April 10, the last day of session. The week has been filled with updates about the BGE situation as well as some clear progress on teacher’s pensions that has been passed from the Senate to the House of Delegates for their approval.

Not a day has gone by that I don’t think about the Eminent Domain crisis that is facing our community, our county and our state.

We had a bill on the floor that we were about to amend to make it a constitutional amendment. By doing this, the bill would then go to referendum in November to be voted on by the people of Maryland. The Senate leadership didn’t want the issue before the people so they recommitted the bill back to committee. A referendum on eminent domain would bring out the more conservative voters for this year’s election, which is obviously not something the Senate and House leadership want with Governor Bob Ehrlich up for re-election.

While the issue has been de-railed for now, stay tuned. If there is a way to do it, you can be sure we will attempt to get a bill before the body on the issue that will allow the people of Maryland to vote on this most important fundamental right.

I want to thank everyone who took the time to fill out my survey this past week. The responses that I have received have been inspiring. The comments that some of you have left have been terrific and I truly appreciate everyone’s support.

One issue that became clear through the survey is that the BGE deregulation and the increase of energy prices has not been explained clearly enough. The lead article in this newsletter is an exclusive discussion written by Public Service Commission for my website.

Be sure to visit our new website at www.nancyjacobs.com


Exclusive Plain Language Explanation of the BGE Rate Hike

Many of you have asked for a plain explanation about this most concerning issue. With help from the Public Service Commission I am able to answer many of your questions
  • How were Rates Set Before Deregulation?
  • What Influences the Price of Electricity?
  • How will the New Prices Affect my Bill?
  • And many more...

CLICK HERE TO READ
THIS EXCLUSIVE ARTICLE NOW

Please forward this newsletter to anyone that you think would be interested in reading this explanation of the BGE rate hike.


SB 297- Contraception Dispensing Program

Senate Bill 297, which has passed through the Education Health and Environmental Affairs Committee, is being heard on the Senate floor this week. This bill creates a Contraception Dispensing Program within the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene to authorize licensed pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception without a prescription.

As part of the program, pharmacists must screen a woman for the appropriateness of emergency contraception on a case by case basis, as well as provide educational materials on the use and effects of such a drug. It is impossible for a comprehensive consult by a pharmacist to take place at the counter of a public pharmacy with a line of waiting patients to overhear.

One of the most popular forms of emergency contraception is Plan B; a proposal to make Plan B available without prescription has been rejected by the FDA twice.

Furthermore, it is important to note some key facts when considering making emergency contraception widely available to females of all ages. According to studies done in Europe, easier access to emergency contraception does not reduce pregnancy nor abortion rates. In fact, in England where emergency contraception is available without prescription, the rate of Sexually Transmitted Diseases has sky rocketed.

Parents are responsible for the health of their minor children, including signing permission for the child to be dispensed Tylenol in a school setting. Yet, Senate Bill 297 would allow these same minor children to walk into a pharmacy and receive emergency contraception, when the medical impact on teenagers using this drug has not be adequately researched. Emergency contraception has many known and unknown health risks and should not be used very often because of the high doses of powerful hormones it contains. Emergency contraception is intended to be taken for "emergency" use only, and could become very harmful if taken on a regular basis.

Easy access to this powerful drug could lead to a detrimental decline in family values, as well as a negative impact of the lives of young women. For example, a victim of rape may forgo the necessary medical, emotional, and legal care and counsel that they need because of their easy access to addressing their primary concern of unwanted pregnancy. Emergency contraception prevents pregnancy by stopping ovaries from releasing eggs, an egg from being fertilized by sperm, or a fertilized egg from attaching to the wall of the uterus. Doctors have extensive educational backgrounds and are the most qualified to determine in which medically necessary circumstance emergency contraception should be dispensed. This decision should not be left in the hands of the local pharmacist who are not able to conduct the necessary patient evaluation at the back counter of a crowded pharmacy.

I urge you to voice your opposition to Senate Bill 297 and the damaging impact on patient care and family values that this bill would have.

Click here to contact me with your thoughts on this critical issue.

Teacher Pension Update


"Will the last teacher to leave Maryland for better pensions please turn off the lights?" reads the sign in the window of the Maryland State Teachers Association office building on Main Street in Annapolis. Maryland teachers have made their presence known this session through letters, phone calls, visits, t-shirts, and stickers all bearing the message "Push for Pensions." This group of Maryland citizens has announced that it is tired of accepting poor compensation for performing one of the most important jobs in any state, the job of educating our children. We have heard the outcry, and now it is time for action.

There are two pieces of legislation currently under consideration in Annapolis. On the Senate side, I have co-sponsored Senate Bill 1019 - Employee's and Teacher's Pension Systems - Pensions Benefit Enhancement, which would increase the benefit multiplier from 1.4% to 1.8%, with a 5% employee contribution, and allow the bill to be retroactive to 1998.

I favor the Senate Bill over the House Bill for a number of reasons. The retroactive aspect of the Senate Bill is far more beneficial to current and recently retired teachers because it allows them to receive the new benefits for previous years of work since 1998. It doesn't go back as far as many would have liked, to take in more of our teachers, but in my mind, it is much more fair to our teachers than the House Bill. The Senate bill is a true compromise that really helps our teachers. I've been hearing from teachers who are upset with the house bill. Many of the teachers contacting me believe the house pension committee has ignored their concerns.

Seventeen per cent of our teachers leave Maryland after teaching here for only 6-10 years. The senate bill is an excellent way to retain current teachers and attract new teachers. This is especially important to Harford and Cecil Counties because of the Base Realignment (BRAC) bringing upwards of 10,000 jobs to Harford and Cecil Counties.

The other bill being considered on the House side is House Bill 1737 - State Employee's and Teachers' Retirement Enhancement Benefit Act of 2006. These bills differ in that the House version raises the contribution to 5.5%, which would be phased in over a span of 5 years, but is limited to state employees. It also offers a 2% multiplier, but does not allow for retroactivity.

This somewhat contrasts the Senate view that the guiding principle for the Senate Bill is not only to gain new teachers, but also to provide for the teachers currently working in Maryland.

As you can see, the differences in the two bills accurately portrays the mindset of each side of the legislature as the House focuses on the future, while the Senate seeks to also compensate the past.

In any case, we have made great strides in our effort to provide just compensation for one of our most valuable tools, our teachers.

Click here to contact me with your thoughts on this critical issue.


News You Can Use

Ehrlich Seeks More Concessions on BGE Rates

Panel OKs bill blocking regent political actions

Md. House Approves Budget Bill

Populism and Electric Bills

Lawmakers split over tax break for retired veterans

State's leaders demand a better deal from BGE

Political notes: Lamone urges evacuees to vote

Moderate pension rhetoric

Discord strikes hard in appointments fight

Rascovar: Averting an electric train wreck

I Want to Hear from You

If these issues or others are of concern to you please contact me. I represent you and your interests in Annapolis.

Click here to access our contact page.


Quick Links...

  • Contact Senator Jacobs
  • Senatorial Scholarship Information
  • Current News and Issues
  • Useful Links
  •  
     
     


    To Top of Page